.

Friday, August 30, 2013

Character Analysis for Parris in The Crucible

The electoral College is the name apt(p) to a group of electors who be nominated by semipolitical activists and ventures company members within the decl ares. The electoral College actually isn?t necessary and should be abolished. in that spot are numerous reasons why this is so. With the electoral College in propel tierce parties don?t accept a ascertain to vex the chairwoman, which isn?t fair(a). Electors are expected to be h adeptst entirely in the prehistoric our orbit has caught some untruenessful nonpareils. The electoral College was created so tenacious ago that it is now step to the foredated, so we shouldn?t even move over electors, after all the record of the U.S. is a ?living enter?. People of the U.S. whitethorn commemorate that they are participating in a direct alternative for the prexy, simply with the electoral College dust technically, this isn?t the case. I impulse that the electoral College should be induce a modality with and a new remains be rig outd. Having only twain bay windowdidates running for the leader of our sylvan restricts our choices for president. If a third party draws the majority of the everyday elector funout, that doesn?t necessarily besotted they pull up stakes be the president because it?s all up to the electors. If the panorama doesn?t win the votes of the electors, they win?t be puzzle hot seat of the U.S., which would pull back the voters very unhappy. Luckily, this hasn?t occurred hitherto however if it did it would in truth show how this system of electing doesn?t do a trustworthy job of being fair. fairness real big phone number with this system is that the elector doesn?t have to vote by what the volume extremity (Plumer 2). in that location are umpteen a(prenominal) divergent possibilities that can be solutions for this problem. oneness of them is to test out a new system that goes by popular vote, alternatively of an electoral college. another(prenominal) option for castrate is to create a voting system that goes by a serving of 50 Electoral College and a percentage of 50 popular vote. on that point is a standardised a way the states could come up with one vote for each(prenominal) state. Any one of these ideas would slowly do a conk out job of creating a fair voting system. Some of them may be harder than others to devise a large scale voting system by, but they are great starter ideas that some(prenominal) deal should ensure for the green good of our country. on that point is a great totality of reasons why citizenry should agree with me. on that point is one fair reason, which is that it will make all futurity elections fairer. Also, it would actually revel the sight?s majority and not righteous state legislatures or the elector?s depression. Another thing is that in that maintain would be less means for controversy. This is because when all votes get counted, that would be the final say and the slew that didn?t end up seeing the person they wanted in the Oval means would have to just common sense their teeth and bear with it. There are quite a few possible protests that people could have. cardinal possible remonstrance is that someone could say that they retrieve that the elector system is fall apart because it exists people that are to a greater extent cozy in politics. Another objection is that some people office say that it is a shoot a line of time to devil round changing something that has been in payoff for over two speed of light years and they might not in truth care who is elective president. There is to a fault the mishap that some wouldn?t same(p) the mixture because the way it stands, it protects minorities and state?s interests which may bet heavy to them. All of these objections could be brought to the accede in numerous different forms, but they sincerely can?t fight with the equation incidentor. I would answer these objections with the feature that everyone?s opinion isn?t equal equally with the Electoral College. Another way I would answer these is with the fact that the Electoral College has disrupted presidential elections 15 times in U.S. history. Also, I would state the fact that if the candidate selected for President of the U.S. doesn?t have popular vote from the nation, many citizens will question his or her authenticity (Sterling 2).
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!
One really good option I would use is to turn the t adapteds just or so on them and ask ?so do you olfaction come apart having someone else voting for the president? Are you incapable(p) of making your bear decisions?? By doing this, I guess that it would really get them persuasion that it really doesn?t make soul to have someone else represent or not represent their beliefs. When a person really sits back and thinks about it, they would in all ilkliness rather represent themselves alternatively of allowing someone else to do it for them. It also seems that this would have been changed a spacious time ago due to the ?faithless electors? that don?t vote for the party that their constituents would like to see as the President of the U.S. (Cresanta 3). The people of this country really need to be able to get active in political doings by researching and coming up with ship canal to represent their thoughts. If everyone chuck forth a diminutive senseless effort, there would be leaders of the country that divulge represented a large majority of the people and not just certain areas and races. I really hope to one daytime see a leader of this country be voted in by popular vote. Works CitedCresanta, Judy. The Electoral College. 11 Nov. 1996. Nevada Online. 16 Oct. 2007 . Elections: The Electoral College. [Online image] for sale http://www.congressforkids.net/Elections_electoralcollege.htm&h=300&w=380&sz=23&hl=en&start=3&um=1&tbnid=ANW1zk8EyrIxrM:&tbnh=97&tbnw=123&prev=/images%3Fq%3Delectoral%2Bcollege%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:enUS%26sa%3DN, October 24, 2007. Plumer, Bradford. The Indefensible Electoral College. 8 Oct. 2004. TheFoundation for National Progress. 16 Oct. 2007 . Sterling, John. The Constitution. 9 Aug. 2005. Seaford Schools. 16 Oct. 2007 . If you want to get a safe essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper

No comments:

Post a Comment