'Blame in Romeo and Juliet Essay\r'

'In the play â€Å"Romeo and Juliet” a serial publication of unfortunate the circumstances and inconsequential decisions force the protagonists into an unacceptable mail ultimately resulting in their wipeout. As Il- lotd as the 2 â€Å"star-crossed buffer’s” may grant been the root of every(prenominal) their problems terminate be traced back to heady decisions by char ventureers and circumstances rigid unfairly on characters by warped societal expectations. art object the friar had nonhing except when the best intentions his illogical and around naive decisions contri only ifed greatly to the cataclysm of Romeo and Juliet.\r\nRomeo’s impetuous, dangerous and unreasoning behavior is in any case to darned. social expectations and outside influences drop be partly to saddle for some(prenominal) of the characters irrational decisions. Although these expectations could be to blest for two ac roll in the hayledgers p arnts behavior it does not justify them completely, thus they are similarly to blame. None of these reasons can be blamed in isolation solely all contributed to the ultimate case of Romeo and Juliets relationship.\r\nThe friar was very mush to blame for the tragic payoff of Romeo and Juliet. He was continuously relied on for advice from Romeo and Juliet and failed to lie with his mis prevails after their deaths. The Friar is blame because he married the two with their parents consent and thought that Romeo’s delight lied â€Å" not truly in [his] heart, but in [his] eyes”. alternatively he absorbishly chose to link up the two, purely â€Å"to turn [their] households’ rancor to pure love” contempt being unknowing of the avowedly nature of their dispute as a priest. Not notwith prevailing this, but he as well expressed that things were moving too fast and that â€Å"violent delights (such(prenominal) as Romeo’s and Juliet’s love) choose viole nt ends” but go on with the wedding anyway. He failed to take care to his declare wisdom and take things â€Å"wisely and slowly”.\r\npatronage prolonging the lives of two suicidal puerilers, they laid their trust in him when he promised to â€Å"blaze [their] conjugation… knock pardon to the Prince, and call thee back”. Because he make no attempt at doing so, he instilled false hope into the couple, which excessively contributed to their deaths. moreover he failed to mortalally deliver the letter explaining Juliet’s faked death to Romeo, instead outsourcing it to another(prenominal) Friar without telling him of its urgency. This leave out of responsibility repeats itself when he gives an unstable, teenage girl a fake-death poison, a untamed idea he should grant known repair not to do. Furthermore, he leaves Juliet when she is at her most vulnerable, alone together with her dead husband. Because he was the only adult Romeo could trust, t he Friar’s naive, rash and immature decisions that overlook to look after Romeo and Juliet properly were at the epicenter for wherefore their deaths occurred.\r\nThe melodramatic character of Romeo is also very much to blame for his fate because of his impetuous decisions and his unfitness to control his emotions. Mature complete to show genuine love for Juliet he is ineffectual to pack logical decisions. Although he showed plenteous common sense to void a armed combat with Tybalt it is elucidate that when misfortune swallows Romeo he becomes an impulsive and somewhat selfish person, valuing his own pride over a life together with Juliet. His immatureness is illustrated when he describes himself as â€Å"fortunes fool” or saying that Juliet make him rickety, as he is solely passing the blame along rather than accepting full phase of the moon responsibility.\r\nIt is obvious that because of Romeo’s weakness, Juliet suffers too. Whether it is victori ous a potion or cleaning herself she continuously risks her neck to jockstrap undo her husband’s wrongdoings. In Friar Laurence’s words Romeo â€Å"is tack aflame(predicate) by thine own ignorance… alike(p)(p) powder in a skill-less soldiers flask.” By climbing the Capulet’s walls, bonding Juliet within days, killing Tybalt and himself, his inadequacy of foresight and awareness of how his actions moved(p) others ultimately lead to Juliet’s and his own death.\r\nThe pressures and expectations formed and enforced by society, forced the characters, into impossible situations, which forced difficult and risky decisions. The Patriarchal society meant women such as Juliet had no illustration in things such as their own marriage. This, coupled with the unjustifiable employment in Verona meant that Juliet was unable to Marry in public, which set off a compass of events ultimately leading to her death. These same values forced Romeo into action with the malevolent Tybalt. At starting time he eludes fighting, telling Tybalt that he â€Å"loves thee better than thou lurch devise” but condescension being loving person at heart the time-worn society which promoted masculinity acted as a catalyst for Romeos impulsive character.\r\nThe corrupting influence of this societal value forced Romeo to go on honor and revenge Tybalt because Juliet â€Å"made him effeminate” or weak like a women. Furthermore the societal values of verity to one family meant pride alone kept the futile conflict a part of everyone’s lives. Because of this and the need to respect ones elders unconditionally it meant that Romeo and Juliet were not able to stand up to their parents and declare the marriage public. When Juliet showed any sort of confusion toward her parent regarding marriage she was step and practically disown. Even after this loyalty to her family influenced Juliet to use â€Å" a thing like death” in order to be with Romeo and â€Å"to ‘scape from (the shame)” that would come with caterpillar tread onward from her family.\r\nThe Parents of Romeo and Juliet are also to blame because as adults they should form showed maturity and put away their pride like the immature Romeo and Juliet and put an end to the excessive conflict. Firstly Capulet directly influences the outcome by forcing the marriage amongst Juliet and Paris despite Juliet’s obvious discomfort. But as adults they had the greater responsibility of move an end to the conflict but quite to the contrary they were seen support and wanting to actively lodge in in it when the fight stony-broke out between rivalry servants. The reason for the cataclysm cannot be blamed on fate because the environment that the parents created meant that their whole love affair was doomed from the beginning. there was no-way their marriage in unfathomed could last forever because enviably Juliet would be fo rced to marry somebody else. The hope, which the youthfulness of Romeo and Juliet embodied, was disappointed by the reality created by their parents. Without this mutual hated the fight between Tybalt and Mercutio would not have occurred, and there would be no issue marrying Romeo thus the outcome of the play can be directly attributed to the conflict instilled in society by the parents of Romeo and Juliet.\r\nIn the play a serial publication of unfortunate situations and illogical decisions by characters create a downhill spiral, which escalates ultimately to the death of Romeo and Juliet. The Friar can be regarded as the character that should have and did know better but failed to act accordingly. While Romeo blinded by emotions failed to make logical decisions or take into account the come to they had on others. These characters were put down the stairs unnecessary pressure by social expectations that existed primly because the parents of Romeo and Juliet failed to double bac k the unjustified conflict in Verona. None of these factors can be blamed in isolation they all were pivotal causes of the tragedy of Romeo and Juliet.\r\n'