Is The Illegalization Of Marijuana Valid? :: pot should be legal

Is The Illegalization of Marijuana Valid?The flip everywhere the legalization of Cannabis sativa, more than commonly knownas marijuana, has been one of the most heated controversies ever to occur in the get together States. Its use as a medicine has existed for thousands of years in galore(postnominal)countries world wide and is documented as far back as 2700 BC in ancient Chinesewritings. When someone says ganja, assholenabis, bung, dope, grass, rasta, or weed,they atomic number 18 talking active the same subject marijuana. Marijuana should belegalized because the governing body could earn money from taxes on its sale, itsvalue to the medical world outweighs its poke fun potential, and because of itsimportance to the paper and clothing industries. This action should be taken notwithstanding efforts made by groups which say marijuana is a harmful do drugs which leave behindincrease crime rates and lead users to other more dangerous substances.     The a ctual story behind the legislature passed against marijuana is quite a surprising. According to Jack Herer, author of The Emperor Wears NoClothes, the acts bringing about the demise of hemp were part of a largeconspiracy involving DuPont, ravage J. Anslinger, commissioner of the FederalBureau of Narcotics (FBN), and many other influential industrial leading such asWilliam Randolph Hearst and Andrew Mellon. Herer notes that the Marijuana evaluateAct, which passed in 1937, coincidentally occurred full as the decoricatormachine was invented. With this invention, hemp would have been able to takeover competing industries almost instantaneously. According to Popular Mechanics,"10,000 acres devoted to hemp will produce as much paper as 40,000 acres ofaverage forest pulp land." William Hearst owned enormous timber acreage so his stakes in preventing the growth of hemp can be easily explained. disputationfrom hemp would have easily driven the Hearst paper-manufacturing company out of blood and significantly lowered the value of his land. Herer even suggestspopularizing the term "marijuana" was a strategy Hearst used in order to createfear in the American public. Herer says "The first step in creating hysteriawas to introduce the grammatical constituent of fear of the unknown by using a word that no onehad ever heard of ahead... marijuana".     DuPonts involvement in the anti-hemp campaign can also be explainedwith great ease. At this time, DuPont was patenting a new sulphuric acid processfor producing wood-pulp paper. According to the companys own records, wood-pulpproducts ultimately accounted for more than 80% of all DuPonts railroad carloadings for the 50 years the Marijuana Tax Act was passed. It should also besaid that two years before the prohibitive hemp tax in 1937, DuPont developed