.

Saturday, March 2, 2019

Gun Control in Canada

A national discourse on throttle guard in Canada has instigated the demand for stricter government control of weapons. Canadians have a strong belief in the established class period of peace, order and good government. Our nation is culturally conditioned with the superior general cultural norm of non- force play. However, with recent news on the increase of gun violence happening in the country, the need to tighten the guidelines on the single-valued function of guns is an urgent matter.Recently, the mayors in Toronto and Montreal have asked the federal government to put in go forth a ban on handguns and assault weapons, and m each quite a little are in support of this concept. However, with close ties and the sharing of a elude with the United States, the line of banning guns would not completely go away. The task with gun control is that these guns can conveniently be smuggled into the country. both that, or professers with registered guns may legally sell these weap ons to people who cannot bribe guns, therefrom enabling them to use the weapons for miserable purposes.Further more than, we see the idea of strong regionalism with an urban-rural class in the country. People living in these rural areas would be more concerned with the ban of these weapons, mainly because the use of their weapons is for hunting purposes. Certain separate in Canada have strong regionalism due to how gun policy is constructed in that area. For example, if we look at Alberta, the province is more open to the ownership of guns, and so a cultural approach to the issue.A potential solution to the problem of gun violence would be to implement a multi-layered system that filters expose anyone that may pose a threat to society. The government should place a restriction on gun sales via a program that controls and tracks the round of guns and holds the owner responsible for any damages caused by the weapon. Background checkers and criminal record history should be ver ified for every individual that wants to purchase a gun.Doing so will ensure civilians that their right to own a weapon is not under threat as long as they accept responsibility/hold themselves liable for whatever danger may come through their property (weapon). This way, guns will not be owned by people with a potential of abusing them, so the person is little likely to use it for the wrong reasons. When compared to the United States, where you can buy guns without any background check, this solution should prove to be much more effective.Lastly, to allege integrity of these policies, a series of checks should be set in place to ensure the weapon is not being sold privately. A insinuation is a weapons check-in system. Gun owners would get a safety check every few years to make sure they still own and are maintaining their weapons. This will ensure that the weapon is being accounted for and has not been sold.It would be a better way to track firearms, which in return, would help in the reduction of gun crimes. In addition, the owner of the gun would be necessitate to renew their license and ensure that their weapon has not been sold without a record. If the following measures are taken, I am certain gun violence may be minimized.

No comments:

Post a Comment